SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11076

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
G. RAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed, inter alia, to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to proceed with further steps to grant license to third parties, with respect to Fair Price Shop No.2 (erstwhile ARD No.2) of the Aranmula Panchayat in Kozhencherry Taluk, till the finalization of Ext.P9 representation submitted by the petitioner.

2. The petitioner was a full time salesman of ARD No.2 of Aranmula Panchayat from 01.09.1988, onwards. The original licensee had surrendered the license to her daughter and the petitioner continued to work as a salesman as reflected in Ext.P5. The new licensee had also expressed her unwillingness to continue with the ration shop due to her physical ailments. Accordingly, ARD No.2 merged with ARD No.8. The petitioner continued as full time salesman in ARD No.8 as well. As per clause 37 (5) of Ext.P7 order, if a Fair Price Shop owner is incapable of running the ration business and his legal heirs are not willing to continue the ration business, the license can be granted to the salesman having ten years of experience. Therefore, the petitioner is eligible to be awarded with the license, in accordance with the provisions of the KTPDSO. Consequently, the pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top