SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9162

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
MUHAMMED JINSHID – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
SIDHARTH O., SUSANTH SHAJI, ALBIN A. JOSEPH, NEKHA VARGHESE

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 6th day of March, 2025

The writ petition is filed to direct the 4th respondent bank to lift the debit freezing of the petitioner’s bank account bearing No.14680200008236.

2. The petitioner is the holder of the above bank account with the 4th respondent bank. The petitioner contends that the 4th respondent bank has frozen the petitioner’s bank account pursuant to a requisition received from the 5th respondent. The action of the 4th respondent is illegal and arbitrary.

3. Heard; the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent submitted that the disputed amount is Rs.24,999/-. The said submission is recorded.

5. In considering an identical matter, this Court in Dr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India [2024 (1) KLT 826] held as follows:

“ a. The respondent Banks arrayed in these cases, are directed to confine the order of freeze against the accounts of the respective petitioners, only to the extent of the amounts mentioned in the order/requisition issued to them by the Police Authorities. This shall be done forthwith, so as to enable the petitioners to deal w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top