SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12711

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
VIJAYAN T @ THANKARAJ – Appellant
Versus
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.SANGEETHA KANNAN, N. KEVIN RENJU

JUDGMENT :

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The petitioner, who is a devotee of Major Vellayani Devi Temple, which is a temple under the management of the 1st respondent Travancore Devaswom Board, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent Assistant Devaswom Commissioner, Neyyatinkara Group and the 4th respondent Sub Group Officer of Vellayani Devaswom to give him an opportunity for making Pachappanthal and also allow him to do the traditional activities in which he was involved in the said temple, such as preparing and carrying ‘Theevetti’, etc. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent Assistant Devaswom Commissioner, Neyyatinkara Group and the 4th respondent Sub Group Officer of Vellayani Devaswom to consider his representations, i.e., Exts.P2 and P3 dated 03.02.2025 and 17.03.2025, made before respondents 3 and 4 and grant permission for making Pachappanthal.

2. In the writ petition, it is stated that the petitioner submitted representation before the 4th respondent Sub Group Officer, Vellayani Devaswom for permitting him to make Pachappanthal for Aswathy Ponga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top