HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Murali Purushothaman, J
ANIL PS – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) 8103/2024
SARFAESI Act - Property Purchase Loan - Loan Default
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner and his wife availed a property purchase loan from the respondent bank. The petitioner defaulted the payment of the instalments and proceedings under SARFAESI Act was initiated by the bank against the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this writ petition for direction to permit him to pay the overdue amount in instalments.
Finding of the Court:
The court permitted the petitioner to pay the overdue amount of Rs.3,47,710/- in four equal monthly instalments commencing from 01.06.2024 along with regular EMIs. In case the petitioner defaults the payment of any of the instalments, the respondent bank can initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. The coercive proceedings pursuant to the notice issued by the bank shall be kept in abeyance to enable the petitioner to pay the amount in instalments.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be permitted to pay the overdue amount in instalments?
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the submissions made by the counsel on both sides and was of the view that the petitioner can be permitted to pay the overdue amount in instalments to enable him to regularize the account.
Final Decision: The court permitted the petitioner to pay the overdue amount in four equal monthly instalments commencing from 01.06.2024 along with regular EMIs, and kept the coercive proceedings in abeyance.
The petitioner and his wife availed a property purchase loan from the respondent bank. The petitioner defaulted the payment of the instalments and proceedings under SARFAESI Act was initiated by the bank against the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this writ petition for direction to permit him to pay the overdue amount in instalments.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Bank, on instructions submits that, as on today (10.05.2024) the overdue amount is Rs.3,47,710/- (Rupees Three lakhs forty seven thousand seven hundred and ten only) and that if the petitioner pays the said amount in lump sum, the account can be regularized.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to pay the overdue amount in four equal monthly instalments.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Bank.
Having regard to the submissions made by the counsel on both sides, I am of the view that, the petitioner can be permitted to pay the overdue amount in four equal monthly instalments commencing from 01.06.2024 along with regular EMIs, In case the petitioner defaults the payment of any of the instlments as above, it will be open the respondent to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. To enable the petitioner to pay the amount in instalments as above, the coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SRJ APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8103/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 22.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK AGAINST LOAN ACCOUNT NO. 639606890. Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 22.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK AGAINST LOAN ACCOUNT NO. 642453366. Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 13.02.2023 ISSUED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER TO THE PETITIONER.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.