HIGH COURT OF KERALA
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SABEEHA BASHEER – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF BARODA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioner challenges Ext.P3 and P4 notices and also seek a direction to consider the application filed by the petitioner for a one time settlement. Ext.P3 is the notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, the SARFAESI Act), while Ext.P4 is the possession notice.
2. Smt.R.Rema, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, upon instructions submitted that the total amount due from the petitioner is Rs.29,30,786/- and that the one time settlement offered by the petitioner for an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- is not acceptable or agreeable to the Bank. The learned counsel further submitted that the respondent is still willing to consider a settlement under one time settlement scheme, if the petitioner enhances the offer for settlement and files an application along with an amount to prove her bonafides.
3. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, there will be a direction to the petitioner to approach the respondent with a fresh proposal for one time settlement along with an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- to show her bonafides.
4. If a proposal as mentioned above is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.