SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 32405

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
,
P. SIVAPRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The petitioner, who is the 1st respondent in O.P.No.147 of

2021 on the file of the Family Court, Nedumangad, has filed this original petition invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order to quash Ext.P3 order dated 08.04.2022 of the Family Court, Nedumangad in I.A.No.3 of 2021 in that original petition, which was a claim petition filed by the 3rd respondent herein, for lifting the order of attachment in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in respect of a vehicle bearing registration No.KL-03/V-8087 (previous No.KL-05/U-

7651).

2. After considering the rival contentions, the Family Court allowed I.A.No.3 of 2021, by Ext.P3 order dated

08.04.2022. Paragraphs 9 and 10 of that order read thus;

“9. Now the learned counsel for the 1st counter petitioner would submit that Ext.A1 document is false and fabricated and by which no consideration has been passed. Further, it is a collusive agreement executed by the counter petitioners 1 and 2 and as such it is to be rejected. Now it is necessary to see the case of the claim petitioner that he has purchased the vehicle and permit for a total consideration of Rs.14,00,00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top