JUDGMENT

The petitioner took voluntary retirement while working as Civil Police Officer. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P8 order dated 01.06.2019 of the 1st respondent State, whereby his application for stamp vendor licence in the premises of this Court stands rejected. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent State to issue him stamp vendor licence in the premises of this Court.

2. On 18.06.2019, when this writ petition came up for admission, this Court admitted the matter on file. The learned Government Pleader took notice for the respondents.

3. A statement has been filed on behalf of the 1st respondent State, opposing the reliefs sought for in this writ petition. The petitioner has filed a reply affidavit dated

01.09.2020, reiterating the contentions raised in the writ petition.

4. On 22.09.2020, the 1st respondent was directed to place on record an additional statement explaining the present status of introduction of e-stamping for all categories of stamps and stamp papers and the modalities for implementing e-stamping facility for judicial stamps and stamp papers, in continuation of implementation of e-stamping for non-judicial stamps and stamp papers. Along with a memo filed by the learned Senior Government Pleader, dated 17.12.2020, a copy of the letter dated 15.12.2020 of the Principal Secretary to Government, Taxes (E) Department, addressed to the learned Advocate General is placed on record.

5. On 18.12.2020, heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

6. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the petitioner was a Civil Police Officer in the Liaison Wing of Kerala Police, attached to the Office of the Advocate General. He took voluntary retirement primarily to look after his son, who is suffering from Muscular Dystrophy. On coming to know that there is a vacancy of stamp vendor in the premises of this Court, on account of the death of two licensed stamp vendors, the petitioner approached the Registrar of this Court with a request dated 03.04.2017 for no-objection certificate. Based on that request, the petitioner was issued with Ext.P1 no-objection certificate dated 20.06.2017, in which it is certified that this Court has no objection in the petitioner selling stamps and stamp papers in the premises of this Court, in the event of his appointment as stamp vendor by the appropriate authority. Ext.P1 no-objection certificate was granted subject to the condition that the petitioner is liable to vacate the premises as and when directed by this Court. As per the provisions of the Kerala Manufacture and Sale of Stamp Rules, 1960, if a licensed vendor dies, his legal representatives can apply and get that licence. According to the petitioner, in the case of two deceased licensed stamp vendors, none of their legal representatives have come forward so far.

7. After obtaining Ext.P1 no-objection certificate, the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 request dated 01.07.2017 before the 2nd respondent District Treasury Officer, Ernakulam, enclosing therewith Ext.P3 application dated 27.07.2017 for stamp vendor licence, in the prescribed format. On receipt of Ext.P2 request, the 2nd respondent by Ext.P4 letter dated 20.01.2018 informed the petitioner that the Government have decided not to grant any new licence for stamp vending in the background of implementation of e-stamping facility. Ext.P4 letter refers to Ext.P5 letter dated 16.01.2016 of the Principal Secretary, Taxes (E) Department, addressed to the Treasury Director, Thiruvananthapuram. As seen from Ext.P5, the Treasury Director requested the State Government to issue guidelines in the matter of grant of stamp vendor licence, confirmation of licence, etc. In Ext.P5 letter, it was made clear that, since the Government is proposing to implement e-stamping facil