Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
FAIZAL KULAPPADAM @ FAIZAL N – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims non-implementation of complaint boxes in schools. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. government contends that provisions have been implemented per directives. (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court directed immediate installation of complaint boxes. (Para 5 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. court's directive for immediate compliance and monitoring. (Para 9) |
S.Manikumar, C.J.
In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:
“i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any order or appropriate direction to the respondents to implement Ext.P1 government order.
ii) Direct the respondents to ensure all the schools in Kerala including Government/Aided and unaided (Higher Secondary, Vocational Higher Secondary) to setup complaint boxes as directed in Ext.P1 government order without further delay.”
2. Shorts facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are as hereunder:
2.1. The General Education Department has issued G.O. (P)No.39/2016/G.Edn. dated 11.02.2016 for setting up students complaint boxes in all schools of Kerala. It was on the basis of a request from the child welfare commission, the Government has decided to issue Exhibit P1 Government Order. In the complaint boxes, studen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
