Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. B. Suresh Kumar, C.S. Sudha, JJ
NISHA VELLAPAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. selection process overview. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims of unfair evaluation. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. court's comments on evaluation fairness. (Para 9 , 11 , 17) |
| 4. conclusion on marks allocation and decision. (Para 14 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
P.B.Suresh Kumar, J.
Both the above appeals arise from the judgment in W.P. (C) No.1861 of 2020 and they are, therefore, disposed of by this common judgment. Among the appeals, W.A.No.957 of 2022 is by the petitioner in the writ petition and W.A.No.1071 of 2022 is by the second respondent in the writ petition. Parties and documents are referred to in this judgment for convenience, as they appear in the writ petition.
2. The matter relates to selection for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in the School of Gandhian Thought and Development Studies (the School) under the Mahatma Gandhi University (the University).
3. Ext.P1 is the notification issued by the University for the selection. In terms of the notification, out of the three vacancies, two were reserved for candidates belonging to Other Backward Classes and one for candidates belonging to General Category. The petitioner as also the second respondent applied for selection
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
