SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33695

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
GOPINATH P, J
JOMET – Appellant
Versus
STATION HOUSE OFFICER – Respondent


ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. Petitioner is the third accused in Crime No.844 of 2021 of Sulthan Bathery Police Station, Wayanad District, alleging commission of offences under Sections 341, 323 and 307 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that, he along with the other accused in the case attacked the defacto complainant resulting in serious injuries to the defacto complainant.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the First Information Statement of the defacto complainant submits that, the allegations are mainly against the 1st accused and not against the petitioner/2nd accused. It is submitted that in fact there is no allegation against the petitioner/2nd accused, which would attract any of the offences alleged against him. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the crime. It is also submitted that taking into account the allegations raised against the petitioner, his custodial interrogation may not be required in the matter.

5. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also. It is submitted that there are very serious injuries suffered by the defacto complainant and th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top