SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33575

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SEEMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

All these writ petitions are connected and therefore, I am disposing of these writ petitions by a common judgment.

2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.8381 of 2022 is the owner of 4.05 Ares (10 cents) of residential plot in Re-survey No.50/3 in Puthussery East Village in Palakkadu Taluk in Palakkadu District. The petitioner got the property from his son Syamlal as per the settlement deed No.5203/2015. Petitioner's son Syamlal purchased the property in the year 2011 vide Sale Deed No.2117/2011. According to the petitioner, the property is not a paddy land and the same was converted to coconut plantations even before the commencement of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. The son of the petitioner made an application for building permit and the 4th respondent issued a building permit to construct a residential building. The Village Officer, Puthussery East on 07.05.2011 issued a possession certificate to the son of the petitioner showing that the property is a residential plot. After construction of the house, the building was assessed for one time tax. After completion of residential building, the petitioner submitted a completion report and requested to num

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top