SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 38103

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DIVYA VIJAYAN. C – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayers:

“(i) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders in Ext.P3 revision in the light of the judgment in W.P.(C).No.11033/2009.

(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 5 not to approve the appointments made by the 6th respondent during the pendency of Ext.P3.”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

3. The petitioner submits that she is the daughter of a teacher working under the 6th respondent's school, who passed away on 22.02.2012. It is submitted that she had claimed appointment in the school which was rejected by the manager by Ext.P1 proceedings. It is submitted that an appeal against the same was also dismissed by the 5th respondent. The petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 revision petition as against Exts.P1 and P2 and seeks a consideration of the same.

4. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision petition preferred by the petitioner, with notice to the petitioner as well as the 6th respondent and after

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top