SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37495

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 6TH SRAVANA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 5313 OF 2021 (CRIME NO.59/2021 OF PERAVOOR EXCISE RANGE, KANNUR DISTRICT)

PETITIONER:

BABU KANDYAN AGED 41 YEARS S/O.MATHU, CHERUVALATH HOUSE, PALAYATTUKARI, VELLARVALLY AMSOM, VALLARVALLY DESOM, IRITTY TALUK, P.O.NEDUMPOIL, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV V.BINOY RAM RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031.

SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – ADV.SRI. SANTHOSH PETER THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The sole accused in Crime No. 59/2021 of Peravoor Excise Range, seeks anticipatory bail on Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.

2. It is alleged that on 07.06.2021 at 11.45 am, while the Excise Officials attached to Peravoor Excise Range Office were conducting patrol duty, they found 100 litres of wash having been concealed in a heap of sacks in the backyard of the house of the petitioner bearing No.IX/446, Peravoor Grama Panchayath. Seeing the Excise party the petitioner was found attempting to take some articles from the heaps of sack. But he could not be arrested at that time. Now, apprehending arrest the petitioner has approached this Court.

3. The learned counsel submits that, the petitioner is a Chemical Engineer working abroad. He came to native place in January this year, that he has no connection whatsoever with the contraband. It is his ancestral home, and that he does not have criminal antecedents.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor has also endorsed the submissions that he does not have any criminal antecedents. 5. It is alleged that the petitioner was present when the

100 litres of wash and other utensils were found at the place and there were reasons to think that preparations for illegal brewing of arrack was in progress. Whatever it may be, whether the petitioner had any nexus with the contraband can be decided only after taking evidence.

6. Pending adjudication of such disputed, questions, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary. He does not have criminal antecedents to his credit. The offence alleged is under Section 55(g) of Kerala Abkari Act, which does not prescribe any statutory minimum substantive sentence and hence the embargo under Section 41(a) of the Abkari Act,is not attracted.

Therefore, the petitioner shall be at liberty to surrender before the Investigating Officer within ten days from today and will make himself available for interrogation; in the event of arrest, he shall be released on bail on executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (fifty thousand rupees only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer; he shall co-operate with the investigation, shall not try to contact or influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence and shall not involve in any crime during the period on bail.

Bail Application is allowed as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top