SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37515

JOBY CHACKO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
['S SAJU', '', 'A V SAJAN', 'NEELANJANA NAIR', 'POOJA SEBASTIAN']

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner, an Indian citizen, intends to marry Ms.Sherlyn Verghese, a citizen of America. On 31.5.2021, the petitioner gave notice of his intended marriage online to the third respondent in terms of Section 5 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (the Act). It is stated by the petitioner that on receipt of the notice, the third respondent has directed the petitioner to produce a few documents, and the petitioner has produced all the documents required by the third respondent. It is alleged by the petitioner that later, the third respondent has directed the petitioner to produce an affidavit of his fiancee attested by a competent officer in the Embassy or Consulate of the United States of America, to the effect that she does not have a spouse living. According to the petitioner, such a condition is not insisted in the case of Indian citizens, and the marriages are permitted to be solemnized and registered under the Act after obtaining notarized affidavits from the parties concerned that he/she does not have a spouse living. It is stated by the petitioner that though the fiancee of the petitioner is prepared to submit a notarized affidavit, the third respondent is not pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top