HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Murali Purushothaman, J
RACHEL MATHAI – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED – Respondent
WP(C) 40520/2024
JUDGMENT
The petitioner joined the service of the Kerala State Electricity Board on 23.11.1992. She applied for leave without allowance for 5 years for joining spouse who was employed abroad. Ext.P1 is the order of the Chief Engineer(HRM), the 2nd respondent, sanctioning leave without allowance under Appendix XII C of Part I KSR. Pursuant to Ext.P1, she went to Kuwait to join her spouse. Before the expiry of the period of leave specified in Ext.P1, the petitioner approached the Board for extension of leave without allowance for another five years. The same was rejected by the 2nd respondent by Ext.P2 communication dated 06.10.2010 and she was asked to report for duty within 15 days of receipt of Ext.P2, failing which her service will be terminated with immediate effect. The petitioner did not join duty pursuant to Ext.P2 due to the educational needs of her children. Later, by Ext.P3 proceedings dated 10.05.2011 of the 2nd respondent, the petitioner was terminated from the service of the Board with effect from 01.08.2010. From Ext.P3, it can be seen that, before termination, the petitioner was issued with a show cause notice dated 08.01.2011 which was returned with the endorsement ‘unclaimed’.
2. The petitioner has produced Ext.P4 representation requesting to reinstate her in service. However, Ext.P4 doesn’t bear any date as to when the said representation was submitted.
3. This writ petition is filed for a direction to quash Ext.P3 order of termination and for direction to the respondents to consider Ext.P4 representation and to re- appoint the petitioner to service.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Board.
By Ext.P1 proceedings of the 2nd respondent, leave without allowance was granted on the condition that if the petitioner does not return to duty immediately on the expiry of leave sanctioned, her service will be automatically terminated. Though the petitioner sought for extension of leave without allowance for another five years on expiry of the leave sanctioned in Ext.P1, the same was rejected by the 2nd respondent as per Ext.P2 and the petitioner was directed to join duty within 15 days. However, she did not join duty. After issuing show cause notice to her, which was returned unclaimed, the 2nd respondent by Ext.P3 proceedings terminated the service of the petitioner. The petitioner has approached this Court after more than 13 years of the termination of her service. The reasons stated for not joining duty are that she had to stay back at Kuwait for the educational needs of her children, and she presumed that her application for extension of leave would be allowed. The said reasons did not find favour with the Board, and the 2nd respondent by Ext.P3 terminated the service of the petitioner. The reasons stated do not merit any consideration by this Court either. The petitioner has availed leave without allowance for 5 years to join spouse with full knowledge that if she does not return to duty on expiry of the period of leave, her service will stand automatically terminated. Sanction or extension of leave cannot be presumed. Further, by Ext.P3 she was informed that her application for extension of leave is rejected and she was asked to report for duty within 15 days which she did not do. The show cause notice issued to her before termination returned ‘unclaimed’. I do not find any reason to interfere with Ext.P3 order and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.