SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 31093

RAUF – Appellant
Versus
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The appellant is the 1st accused in S.C.No.167 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Judge-Vadakara. He was tried for the offences punishable under Sections 332 and 307 read with Section 34 of IPC and was convicted for the sole offence punishable under Section 332 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. He was acquitted of charge under Section 307 of IPC. Being aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence, this appeal is preferred.

2. He was charge sheeted by the Sub Inspector of Police, Nadapuram, before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nadapuram, along with the co-accused for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 332, 307 and 294(b) read with :-3-:

Section 34 IPC, on the allegation that the accused after sharing their common intention, wrongfully restrained PW1, a Police Constable who was a member of the Mobile Squad attached to Armed Force Battalion, Thrissur on 29.5.2000 at 8 p.m. and voluntarily caused hurt on him deterring his official duties in a public road in Nadapuram town by means of M.O.1 metal piece. Since the co- accused was not available and was reported to be absconding, the case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top