SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34072

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
M.B. SNEHALATHA, J
K.M.SAINUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.ELDHO

O R D E R

In this revision petition, petitioner assails the order dated 24.2.2018 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Perumbavoor by which the learned Magistrate dismissed his petition to condone the delay of 762 days in re-presenting a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NI Act’) which was returned for filing before the proper court having jurisdiction.

2. Petitioner’s case is that, alleging offence under Section 138 of N.I.Act for dishonour of a cheque issued by the accused drawn on ICICI Bank, Aluva, he filed a complaint before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Perumbavoor and the court took cognizance of the matter and the proceedings were initiated against the accused who is the 2nd respondent herein. While the matter was pending there, in view of the decision of the Apex Court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra and another ( 2014(3) KHC 362 ), the case records were returned on 1.12.2014 from Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Perumbavoor for filing it before the appropriate court ie. before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I, Aluva. Accordingly, his counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top