O R D E R

The third respondent in the writ petition seeks review of the judgment. The parties and documents are referred to in this order, as they appear in the writ petition.

2. The petitioners obtained building permit B.A.No.755/2011 during 2012 from the first respondent Municipality for construction of a building in a land stated to be owned and possessed by them measuring 31.59 cents. The mother of the third respondent challenged the building permit before the Tribunal in Appeal No.225 of 2011 on the ground mainly that the petitioners do not have title to the land over which the building is proposed by them. The case set out by the mother of the third respondent in the appeal was that the building is proposed by the petitioners in a portion of her land also, which is situated on the southern side of the land of the petitioners. It was pointed out by the mother of the third respondent in the appeal that she had already filed a suit for recovery of possession of her land from the petitioners as O.S.No.293 of 2010 before the Sub Court, Ernakulam, and the said suit is pending. The Tribunal allowed Appeal No.225 of 2011 and directed the second respondent to reconsider the application