ORDER

This Crl.M.C. has been preferred to quash Annexure-1 FIR in Crime No.940/2021 of Vadakkencherry Police Station on the ground of settlement between the parties.

2. The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 5. The 1st respondent is the de facto complainant.

3. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 of the IPC.

4. The 1st respondent entered appearance through counsel. An affidavit sworn in by her is also produced.

5. I have heard Sri.Baby Mathew, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri.Ignatius.M, the learned counsel for the 1st respondent and Smt.T.V. Neema, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor for the 2nd respondent.

6. The averments in the petition as well as in the affidavit sworn in by the 1st respondent would show that the entire dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and the de facto complainant has decided not to proceed with the crime further. The learned Prosecutor, on instruction, submits that the matter was enquired into through the investigating officer and a statement of the de facto complainant was also recorded wherein she reported that the matter was amicably settled.

7. The Apex Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [2012 (4) KLT 108 (SC)], Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Others [(2019) 5 SCC 688] has held that the High Court invoking S.482 of Cr.P.C can quash criminal proceedings in relation to non compoundable offence where the parties have settled the matter between themselves notwithstanding the bar under S.320 of Cr.P.C. if it is warranted in the given facts and circumstances of the case or to ensure ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process of any Court.

8. The dispute in the above case is purely personal in nature. No public interest or harmony will be adversely affected by quashing the proceedings pursuant to Annexure-1.

The offences in question do not fall within the category of offences prohibited for compounding in terms of the pronouncement of the Apex Court in Gian Singh (supra), Narinder Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra).

For the reasons stated above, I am of the view that no purpose will be served in proceeding with the matter further. Accordingly, the Crl.M.C. is allowed. Annexure-1 FIR in Crime No.940/2021 of Vadakkencherry Police Station stands hereby quashed.

Sd/-

DR.KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE

skj

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 6129/2021 PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR DATED 5/8/2021 IN CRIME NO.940/2021 OF VADAKKENCHERY POLICE STATION.

Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE F I STATEMENT DATED

5/8/2021 IN CRIME NO.940/2021 OF VADAKKENCHERY POLICE STATION Annexure 3 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED

9/10/2021 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT