SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 21346

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 17TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 3410 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S:

SHIMI HAMEED T.P.

AGED 45 YEARS W/O.ASHARAF, HSST MATHEMATICS M.I. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679577 BY ADVS.

GEORGE ABRAHAM JOBY D JOSEPH MARY CATHERINE PRIYANKA P.S.

RESPONDENT/S:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

2 DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, HIGHER SECONDARY SECTION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

3 REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676505

4 UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, BAHADURSHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 110002 BY ADVS.

FOR R1 TO R3 BY SMT.K.G.SAROJINI, GOVT.PLEADER FOR R4 BY ADITYA THEJUS KRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

24.07.2024,THE COURT ON 08.08.2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition is submitted by the petitioner, who is appointed as HSST(Maths) in M.I. Higher Secondary School for Girls, Ponnani, Malappuram District. The petitioner's grievance concerns the denial of approval for the said post.

2. The facts which led to the filing of this Writ Petition are as follows:

2.1.The petitioner is a B.Sc Degree holder in Mathematics, which was obtained from Calicut University in April 1998. She holds a B.A.Degree in Mathematics from the University of Kerala in 1999. On the basis of the said qualifications, she was appointed as UPSA in M.I. Higher Secondary School. The said appointment was approved, and later, she was promoted to HSA (Maths) on 4.7.2011, as evidenced by Exhibit P1.

2.2. While working as HSA (Maths), the petitioner had undergone M.Sc Degree course conducted by the Annamalai University through Distance Education Board. The petitioner joined the said course for the batch 2007-2009. However, she could not successfully complete all the papers of the said course, as she failed to clear some of the subjects. Ultimately, the petitioner could successfully qualify for the post-graduation course only in the examination conducted during the month of May 2017, and the mark list dated 5.9.2017 issued in respect of the said examination is Ext.P9. On the basis of the same, the petitioner was issued with a degree certificate by the Annamalai University on 17.02.2018, which is Ext.P10.

2.3. While so, in one of the schools managed by the corporate agency of the school of the petitioner, a vacancy of HSST (Maths) arose on 1.4.2020. However, the petitioner did not stake any claim for the said post at the relevant time, as she had not completed 10 years of service to get qualified for the said post. Smt. Jamsheena M.C., who was working in the said school as an HST, had the said qualifications. However, as there was a general ban on account of the Covid-19 pandemic in making the appointment, the vacancy could not be filled up by the management. Later, on 15.7.2021, the Government issued Government order permitting the lifting of the ban and thereby permitting the appointments in the school. By that time, the petitioner had completed 10 years of service and, therefore, the petitioner raised a claim for the said post. As part of the same, the petitioner challenged the selection of Jamsheena M.C by filing WP(C)No.24869/2022 before this Court and this Court directed the 2nd respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner.

2.4. In compliance with the judgment, a hearing was conducted by the 2nd respondent and as per Ext.P11, the claim put forward by the petitioner was rejected, mainly on the reason that, as on the date of occurrence of the vacancy, the petitioner was not having the minimum service of 10 years. Another reason for rejecting the claim of the petitioner was that the postgraduate degree obtained by the petitioner from Annamalai University could not be recognized as the UGC had issued a notice to the effect that, after the academic year 2015-2016, the Annamalai University cannot offer any distance education course.

3. Later, another vacancy of HSST(Maths) arose in M.I.Higher Secondary School. The Manager promoted the petitioner to the said post by issuing Ext.P12 appointment order dated 25.8.2022. On the basis of Ext.P12, the petitioner joined duty on the same day and Ext.P13 is the certificate evidencing of the same. However, the approval of the said appointment has not been granted so far, presumably because of the reason that, there is already a finding in Ext.P11 to the effect that the postgraduate degree obtained by the petitioner is not a recognized one and thereby cannot be acted upon. According to the petitioner, she has all the qualifications and the postgraduate degree obtained by her from Annamalai University has been treated as equivalent to the M.Sc degree of the University of Calicut University as well as M.G. University. Exhibits P14 and P15 are the Equivalency Certificates

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top