SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 32435

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Murali Purushothaman, J
KUNHI MOHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
VYTHIRI GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the owner of 11.95 Ares of land in Re.Sy No.108/24 of Chundel village of Vythiri Taluk of Wayanad District. According to him, there was a commercial building in the said property which has been assigned building numbers and assessed to property tax.

2. The petitioner proposed to construct a new commercial building after demolishing the old building. Accordingly, he made an application for building permit on 28.9.2021, which was rejected vide Ext.P10 order by the 2 nd respondent on the ground that the property is shown as exempted plantation land under Section 81 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act , 1963 (for short, 'the Act') in the Possession Certificate. The petitioner contends that his property does not form part of any exempted land under the Act.

3. Heard Sri. Abdul Jawad. K., the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Manoj Ramaswamy, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

4. The petitioner purchased the land in question as per Ext.P1 sale deed on 7.9.2016. It is not disputed that there was a commercial building in the land which was assessed to property tax. He applied for building permit for construction of a new commercial building afte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top