JUDGMENT

1. The defendants in the suit are the appellants herein. The Plaintiffs filed the suit originally for permanent prohibitory injunction. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiffs incorporated a relief for recovery of possession also.

2. As per the amended plaint allegations, plaint A schedule property belonged to the first plaintiff as per Ext.A1 Sale Deed. In the year 2003, she sold one acre of land from the plaint A schedule property to the second plaintiff as per Ext.A3. The plaint A schedule property is a coconut garden and has been lying as a compact plot. The defendants have property on the eastern side of Plaint A schedule property. The defendants attempted to trespass into a portion of plaint A schedule property on 22.03.2011 and attempted to remove soil using JCB. Hence, the suit was filed. The Advocate Commissioner has denoted Plaint B schedule property as X, Y, Z as a part of Plaint A schedule property in the Commission Report and Plan. It is shown in Resurvey No.129/1 in the name of the defendants. As per old survey records, it is a portion of the plaint A schedule property. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover the same if it is found in the possession of the