SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30709

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
DAYANA .M.K – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Alexander Thomas, J The first respondent herein has filed the instant Ext.P1 Original Application OA No.681/2019 before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench with the following prayers.

(I) call for the records resulting in Annexure A5 order, set aside the same and direct the respondents to consider Annexure A3 request of the applicant favorably in accordance with Clause 10.3 of Annexure A2 Order.

(ii) pass such other orders as is deemed fit and proper by this Hon'ble Tribunal.

2. The Tribunal after hearing both sides has rendered the impugned Ext.P3 final order dated 21.01.2020 whereby OA (EKM) No.681/2019 has been finally disposed of, with the finding that with the adoption of the UGC Regulations, 2010 by the State Government, the respondents in the OA are legally obliged by the provisions therein, as has been held by the Full Bench of this Court in Radhakrishna Pillai Vs. Travancore Devaswom Board 2016 (2) KLT 245(FB) and that therefore, the applicant who is a Assistant Professor of law, who is admittedly having the qualification LLM as on the date of entry in service is entitled to get two non-compounded advance increments going by the prescriptions in Clau

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top