SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 35839

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AMIT RAWAL, Easwaran S., JJ
KOORANTAKATH KAMALUDEEN – Appellant
Versus
KANNYAATH DIVAKARAN – Respondent


Advocates:
R.PARTHASARATHY, B.KRISHNAN, Nisha George

Table of Content
1. jurisdictional applicability (Para 6 , 7)
2. lack of fresh notification (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Amit Rawal, J.

The present revision petition is directed against the order dated 3.10.2024 of the Rent Controller rejecting the application bearing No.11 of 2024 filed by the petitioner-tenant for dismissing the RCP No.18 of 2022 and connected RCP No.60 and 81 of 2022 for want of jurisdiction.

2. Respondent-landlord had filed three rent petitions on various grounds. At this stage, regarding non availment of the remedy of revision against the common order in rent control petition Nos. 60 and 81 of 2022, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the revision petition may be treated against all the pending RCPs. We do not accept this argument for the reason that even if the order is common in three (3) revision petition required to be filed as similar applications have been considered in the other rent petitions. Faced with the situation counsel for the petitioner seeks the indulgence of this Court for treating the decision of the application in RCP No.18 of 2022 with a liberty to file separate revision petitions. Ordered accordingly.

3. Respondent-landlord instituted the rent petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top