Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Murali Purushothaman, J
JAYASREE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners argue against stamp duty (Para 3) |
| 2. sub registrar's objections (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. partition deed valid among family (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners 1 to 4 are the children of late Gouri and the petitioners 5 and 6 are the legal heirs of Malathi, the deceased daughter of Gouri. The property having an extent of 8.90 Ares situated in Re Survey No. 322/41 (Old Survey No. 532/41) of Kolazhi Village, Thrissur Taluk was purchased by Gouri along with her son Sri.Chandrahasan and daughter late Malathi as per Ext. P1 sale deed dated 3.10.1950. Sri. Chandrahasan, as per Ext. P2 Release deed dated 20.02.1990, had released his share in the above mentioned property in favour of Gouri. As per Ext. P3 registered Settlement deed dated 25.02.2000, Gouri had settled her 2/7th share in the above mentioned property derived as per Ext. P1 sale deed and Ext. P2 release deed in favour of her daughters, Smt. Jayasree, the 1st petitioner, Smt. Shyamala Devi, the 2nd petitioner and Smt. Sreelatha, the 3rd petitioner. In Ext. P3 Settlement deed, it is mentioned that the petitioners 1 to 3 and their brother Sri. Radhakrishnan, the 4th petitioner, are h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
