JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and also the learned Public Prosecutor.

2. When the writ petition was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner limits the relief claimed in the writ petition only for issuing a direction to the third respondent to consider

Ext.P8 representation made to him by the wife of the petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that there is no objection to adopt such a course and to dispose of the writ petition.

4. In the aforesaid circumstances, the third respondent is directed to consider Ext.P8 representation, if any, made to him by the wife of the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of two months from today.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- R. NARAYANA PISHARADI JUDGE lsn APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CRIME OCCURRENCE REPORT IN CRIME NO.153/2019 OF ADOOR EXCISE RANGE EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MAHAZAR DATED 24/07/2019 PREPARED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 16/02/2019 PREFERRED BY JOY P. SAMUEL BEFORE THE HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PA