SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34097

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J, Dr, Kauser Edappagath, J
GEORGE KOSHY – Appellant
Versus
SARAH KOSHY – Respondent
Mat.Appeal/497/2020



Advocates:
SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW SRI.JEPH JOSEPH SRI.JOHNSON K.KURIEN

Anti-suit injunctions can be granted in matrimonial disputes, maintaining jurisdiction under the Family Courts Act and governed by the Specific Relief Act principles.

Headnote:

Injunction - Family Law - Family Courts Act Section 7(1), Specific Relief Act Section 41 - The court explored the principles of anti-suit injunctions, emphasizing their application in matrimonial disputes, and clarified the jurisdiction of family courts in granting such reliefs, leading to the decision to set aside the lower court's dismissal.

Fact of the Case:

The appeal addresses a family court's dismissal of an anti-suit injunction petition, which aimed to restrain the respondent from pursuing a divorce petition in Australia. The dismissal was based on the court's claim of lacking jurisdiction.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the family court could maintain anti-suit injunctions under the Family Courts Act. It noted the importance of proper jurisdictional application and relevant legal standards before dismissing cases.

Issues: The main issue was whether the family court had the jurisdiction to grant an anti-suit injunction in the context of an ongoing divorce proceeding in another country.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that anti-suit injunctions are maintainable in family law, especially regarding matrimonial disputes, and must be handled cautiously with adherence to statutory guidelines.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the family court's order was set aside, directing it to hear the case on its merits.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE &

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1943 Mat.Appeal.No.497 OF 2020 Against order in Unnumbered OP of 2020 (CF 2580/2020) dated

11/8/2020 of Family Court, Pathanamthitta)

APPELLANT/S: GEORGE KOSHY AGED 50 YEARS S/O.K.G.KOCHUKOSHY, KONNAYIL HOUSE, OPP VHSS, KAIPATTOOR MURI, VALLICODE VILLAGE, KAIPATTOOR P.O., KONNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA PIN-686 648.

BY ADVS.

SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW SRI.JEPH JOSEPH SRI.JOHNSON K.KURIEN RESPONDENT/S:

SARAH KOSHY AGED 45 YEARS KALLOORTHAZHCHAYIL, MARTHOMA COLLEGE ROAD, KUTTAPPUZHA, R.S.P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689

103(ALSO HAVING PRESENT RENTAL ADDRESS AT 16 DURANT PLACE CHERRYBROOK, 2126 NSW, AUSTRALIA)

THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & DR.KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JJ.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

MAT.APPEAL NO.497/2020 “C.R.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 9th day of April 2021 The appeal arises from an unnumbered original petition filed by the appellant herein. The original petition was filed for an anti-suit injunction before the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. The Family Court, without issuing notice, by a detailed order dismissed the original petition holding that it has no jurisdiction to entertain the original petition.

The said order is under challenge in this appeal.

2. The anti-suit injunction was filed to restrain the respondent from proceeding with the divorce petition filed by her in Australia.

3. As disclosed from the pleadings, the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnised at St.Ignatious Orthodox Church Kaipattoor. Anti-suit injunction is a species of injunction.

4. Anti-suit injunction is instituted to prevent the opposite party from instituting or continuing with the proceedings in another Court in domestic or foreign country.

5. In matrimonial matters, the parties may be entitled to invoke different jurisdiction - jurisdiction based on domicile or jurisdiction based on celebration of marriage etc.

6. In Modi Entertainment Network and Ors.v. W.S.G.

Cricket PTE Ltd [ AIR 2003 SC 1177 ], the Hon'ble Supreme Court examined the general principles related to anti-suit injunction by Courts. It is appropriate to refer the relevant portion of the said judgment which reads as follows:

The Courts in India like the Courts in England are Courts of both law and equity. The principles governing grant of injunction an equitable relief-by a Court will also govern grant of anti-suit injunction which is but a species of injunction. When a Court restrains a party to a suit/proceeding before it from instituting or prosecuting a case in another Court including a foreign Court, it is called anti-suit injunction. It is a common ground that the Court in India has power to issue anti-suit injunction to a party over whom it has personal jurisdiction, in an appropriate case. This is because Courts of equity exercise jurisdiction in personam. However, having regard to the rule of comity, this power will be exercised sparingly because such an injunction though directed against a person, in effect causes interference in the exercise of jurisdiction by another Court.

7. The Apex Court in a recent Order in Madhavendra L.Bhatnagar v. Bhavna Lall [(2021) 2 SCC 775] the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that anti-suit injunction can be issued if the other party had already resorted to proceedings before another court including outside India.

8. In Vivek Rai Gupta v. Niyati Gupta [(2018) 17 SCC

21], the Apex Court particularly referred to anti-suit injunction in matrimonial disputes.

9. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dinesh Singh Thakur v. Sonal Thakur [ AIR 2018 SC 2094 ] also referred to parameters in granting reliefs in anti-suit injunctions in matrimonial disputes.

10. Renowned authors, Shri Anil Malhotra and Ranjit Malhotra in their book 'The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top