SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6390

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
MOSHA, – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA, – Respondent
Bail Appl. 321/2024



An accused is entitled to pre-arrest bail if he cooperates with the investigation, does not intimidate witnesses, does not interfere with the investigation, does not get involved in any other offense while on bail, and does not leave India without the permission of the court.

Headnote:

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was accused of committing offenses under Sections 294(b), 324, and 326 of the Indian Penal Code. He filed a bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner had surrendered before the Investigating Officer and his interrogation was completed. The court also noted that the petitioner's further presence was not required.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted pre-arrest bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was entitled to pre-arrest bail subject to certain conditions, including that he cooperate with the investigation, not intimidate witnesses, not interfere with the investigation, not get involved in any other offense while on bail, not leave India without the permission of the court, and that the court would have the power to cancel his bail if he violated any of these conditions.

Final Decision: The court made the interim order dated 2.2.2024 absolute, subject to the conditions mentioned above.

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.758/2023 of the Vellarada Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, registered against the accused, for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. When the bail application came up for consideration on 2.2.2024, this Court passed an interim order, by directing the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer within seven days from the date of order and subject himself to interrogation.

4. Heard; Sri.D.Kishore, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Nima Jacob, the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that, pursuant to the order dated 2.2.2024, the petitioner surrendered before the Investigating Officer on 5.2.2024 and his interrogation has been completed. The petitioner’s further presence is not required. Hence, the interim order can be made absolute, subject to additional conditions. The said submission is recorded. Resultantly, the bail application is disposed of by making the interim order dated 2.2.2024 absolute, subject to the following conditions:

    (i) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation and for the purpose of investigation as and when the Investigating Officer directs;
    (ii) The petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses or interfere with the investigation in any manner;
    (iii)The petitioner shall not get involved in any other offence while on bail.
    (iv) The petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the jurisdictional Court;
    (v) In case of violation of any of the conditions above, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law.
    (vi) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall also be filed before the court below.
    (vii) Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if 2024:KER:14401 any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [2020 (1) KHC 663].
    sd/- any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [2020 (1) KHC 663].
    sd/- sks/23.2.2024 C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top