HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
DR PA SHAJAHAN @ SHAJAHAN – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY – Respondent
The petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of Ext.P2 by which the Panchayath-respondents 1 and 2 refused to number the building which he put in terms of the permit granted by the Panchayath. By Ext.P2 dated 22.8.2023, the Panchayath insisted on access permission from the National Highway Authority of India. The petitioner therefore prays for setting aside Ext.P2 and to direct respondents 1 and 2 to number the building of the petitioner completed as per Ext.P1 permit Learned counsel for the Panchayath submits that the building will be numbered if the construction is in tune with the permit granted. This Court has passed an interim order on 23.2.2024 directing the Panchayath to provisionally number the building subject to the further orders to be passed in the writ petition. The Panchayath cannot refuse to number the building of the petitioner if the same is put in terms of Ext.P1 permit. If the petitioner wants access from the National Highway, he has to take recourse under Section 28 of the Control of WP(C)No.30775/2023 National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to make such an application, this writ petition is dis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.