JUDGMENT :

Sathish Ninan, J.

RFA No.341 of 2017 and RFA No.201/2017 are by the plaintiff and the defendant respectively, in OS 234/2007. The suit was by the Department, for a declaration that the defendant-Contractor committed breach of contract, and for damages. It was decreed in part by the trial court. RFA 145/2022 is filed by the Contractor, challenging the dismissal of his suit for a declaration that the termination of the contract by the Department is void, and for realisation of money. The suit was dismissed by the trial court. As noticed, the suits are by the Department and the Contractor, against each other.

2. Ext.A1 agreement dated 11.03.2004 was entered into between the parties with regard to the work of “Improvement of Riding Quality Works” in Km. 42/000 to 55/000 of NH-212. The work was to be completed within three months. According to the Department, the site was handed over to the contractor on 19.03.2004. In spite of repeated instructions, both oral and in writing, the contractor failed to execute the work. After issuing Ext.A7 show cause notice dated 27.05.2005, the contract was terminated as per Ext.A11 order dated 29.07.2005. The contractor was put on notice that,