SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6513

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ
MOOSA KUNJU – Appellant
Versus
ARIFA BEEVI – Respondent


Advocates:
C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL, ALEXANDER GEORGE, P.ABDUL NISHAD, RAIHANATH T.H.

JUDGMENT

P.G.Ajithkumar, J.

The appellant assails the judgment in O.P.No.1268 of 2020 on the files of the Family Court, Nedumangad in this appeal filed under Section 19 (1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 . The appellant filed O.P.No.1268 of 2020 seeking a declaration that the Talaq he pronounced to dissolve his marriage with the respondent was valid. The Family Court dismissed the original petition as per the judgment dated 31.03.2022.

2. The respondent entered appearance through her learned counsel. Delay of 18 days in filing the Mat.Appeal was condoned as per the order dated 07.12.2022.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, who submitted that the respondent has no objection in allowing the appeal.

4. The appellant married the respondent on 05.06.1967 as per the Muslim religious rites. Following marital discord, the appellant divorced the respondent. Talaq was pronounced on 05.10.1971. Talaq was properly communicated to the Jama-ath Committees of both parties. The appellant remarried on 08.08.1972. He was working with Indian Military Services. The Military Authorities insisting on production of an order of the co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top