SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 36476

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
BABY – Appellant
Versus
SIMI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This Regular Second Appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.34/2014 on the file of Subordinate Judge's Court, Ernakulam, which arose out of judgment and decree in O.S.No.85/2011 on the file of First Additional Munsiff's Court, Ernakulam.

2. Appellant is the defendant in O.S.No.275/2009. (The parties would hereinafter be referred as per their status before the trial court).

3. The suit was one for declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction. Plaint 'A' schedule property is jointly owned by the plaintiff and her husband and is having an extent of 4.20 Ares. Defendant is the owner of plaint 'B' schedule property which is situated on the southern side of plaint 'A' schedule property. A 14 links wide pathway has been provided from plaint 'A' schedule property upto the public road for ingress and egress towards east which is described as plaint 'C' schedule pathway. The predecessor in interest of the plaintiff have also been using plaint 'C' schedule pathway openly and without any interruption. There was a thondu on the eastern side of plaint 'A' schedule property which starts from plaint 'C' schedule pathway and runs towards p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top