Dated this the 9th day of April, 2024 The Original Petition first above referred stems from a judgment in the C.M.A, vacating an order of injunction; and the second, from the common judgment in two other C.M.As, vacating an order in the nature of a mandatory injunction to restore a bunk, which was allegedly demolished in violation of the order of injunction first above referred. A

suit for injunction was preferred by the plaintiffs (petitioners herein) as O.S.No.262/2019 before the Munsiff's Court, Attingal. Along with the suit, the plaintiff moved an application for an ad interim order of injunction, which was allowed, restraining the respondent/defendants (two in number then) from forcefully evicting the plaintiffs from the plaint schedule bunk and its ..4.. premises and also from destructing the scheduled bunk. This order was confirmed after hearing the parties by the learned Munsiff. C.M.A.No.11/2020 was preferred by the defendants in the suit (respondents 1 & 2 in O.P.(C)No.2411/2022 herein), challenging the said order of injunction. The C.M.A. was allowed and the order of injunction was vacated, which judgment is under challenge in O.P. (C)No.2411/2022.

2. In the me