SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 18917

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAMSUDHEEN – Appellant
Versus
RAJEENA – Respondent


ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 30.10.2012 in M.C.No.250/2010 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vadakara and also the common order dated 30.01.2015 in Crl.R.P.Nos.12 of 2013 and 13/2013 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Vadakara.

2.The petitioner is the respondent in M.C.No.250/2010 filed by the 1st respondent herein before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Vadakara and the case was filed under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection on Divorce) Act 1986 claiming reasonable and fair provision for maintenance as a divorced wife along with iddah period. There were other prayers also in the petition. The learned Magistrate allowed the petition in part by granting maintenance during iddah period as Rs.9,000/- and towards reasonable and fair provision, Rs.1,80,000/-.Crl.M.C.1705/2017

3.Aggrieved by the above order, the petitioner filed Crl.R.P.No.12/2013 and the respondent filed Crl.R.P.No.13/2013.

These two revisions were considered together by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vadakara. Learned Sessions Judge allowed Crl.R.P.No.13/2013 filed by the 1st respondent by enhancing the amount

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top