The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2.The petitioner apprehends arrest by the Palarivattom Police Station, Ernakulam, in an unknown crime for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.

3.Heard; Sri.M.T. Sureshkumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Neema T.V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

4.The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.552/2024 of the Palarivattom Police Station, which is registered against the accused for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of the B.A.No.3627/2024 Indian Penal Code, 1860 . The said submission is recorded.

5.on a reading of the bail application, it can be seen that none of the details or materials pertaining to the incident, crime number, the offences or the rank of the accused have been stated. the bail application is vague and lacks the requisite details, particularly the offences levelled against the petitioner. it is well-settled in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab [(1980) 2 scc 565 ] as