SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4566

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K. Babu, J
SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
EXCISE INSPECTOR KALPETTA RANGE AND ANO – Respondent


Advocates:
ADV SRI.N.J.ANTONY, ADV.SMT.REKHA, GP SRI.RAJESH A, SPL GP

JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by the judgment dated 13.05.2009, passed by the Additional Sessions Court (Adhoc)-II, Kalpetta in Sessions Case No. 494/2006, the accused has preferred this appeal. The appellant was convicted under Section 8 (2) of the Abkari Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of two years and pay a fine of Rs.1 Lakh.

2. The prosecution case is that on 25.03.2006 at

2.45 p.m., the accused was found in possession of 20 litres of arrack at Thrikkaipetta, in violation of the provisions of the Abkari Act .

3. After completing the investigation, final report was submitted against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 8 (2) of the Abkari Act before the jurisdictional Magistrate. The case was committed to the Sessions Court from where it was made over to the trial Court. On the appearance of the accused charge was framed against him for the offence punishable under Section 8 (2) of the . The accused pleaded not guilty to the charge and therefore, he came to be tried by the trial Court for the aforesaid offence.

4. The prosecution examined PWs 1 to 5 and proved Exts.P1 to P7, MOs 1 and 2.

5. After the closure of the evidence on behalf of the pros

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top