SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 36986

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
E.K.SALIM
– Appellant
Versus

SHAMSUDHEEN – Respondent


Advocates:
LATHEESH SEBASTIAN

JUDGMENT

The original petition is filed to direct the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Attingal (Appellate Court), to consider and dispose of I.A. No.384/2019 (Ext.P3) within a time frame and until such time to stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.36/2018 in O.S. No.469/2012 of the Court of the Munsiff, Attingal (Trial Court).

2. The petitioner’s case is that, he was the defendant in the O.S. No.469/2012 filed by the respondent. The suit was decreed on 28.01.2017. The petitioner has objected to the decree by filing A.S. No.30/2019 before the Appellate Court along with Ext.P3 application to condone the delay of 582 days. The Appellate Court has not considered the stay petition till date. The respondent is now executing the decree. A warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner has filed I.A. No.1/2022 in the appeal, to advance the hearing of the delay condonation petition and hear the same expeditiously. However, if the petitioner is arrested in the meantime, he would suffer severe hardship. Therefore, the execution court may be directed to keep the coercive proceedings in abeyance. Hence, the original petition.

3. Heard; Sri.Latheesh Sebastian,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top