HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
SREEKANTHAMENON – Appellant
Versus
SATHEESHKUMAR MENON – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 26th day of October, 2021 This original petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order passed by the Munsiff Court, Palakkad in E.P.No.166/2014 in S.T.No.1227/2013 dated 5th day of December, 2015, whereby the Execution Court found that there is no means for the judgment debtor to proceed in execution and accordingly, the execution petition was dismissed. It is thus challenging the legality and correctness of the said order, this original petition is filed.
2. The paramount contention advanced by the petitioner is that from Exhibits P8 to P10 advertisements, it is clear that the claim of no means to pay the decretal debt by the respondent is baseless; in Exhibit P10 advertisement made by the respondent /judgment debtor, it is clear that the catering business conducted by the respondent is actively pursuing business and catering to larger marriage functions as well; that Exhibit P8 pamphlet makes it clear that catering business is being conducted not only at Vadakkanthara, Palakkad but also has three different branches in Kozhijampara, Kunnathurmedu and Kuzhalmannam.; that the respondent is in possession and ownership of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.