SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8372

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
G. GIRISH, J
JEEVAN JOY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
P.VISHNU PRASAD, KUM.T.S.ATHIRA

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in S.T.No.625/2020 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Mavelikkara. The offences alleged against him are under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, ‘ IPC '), and Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988 (in short, ‘ MV Act’). He seeks to quash the proceedings in the said case on the grounds of procedural irregularities on the part of the investigating agency.

2. The prosecution case is that on 05.03.2020, at about 8:00 p.m, the accused/petitioner was found to have been driving a motor car under the influence of alcohol, in a rash and negligent manner, likely to endanger human life, through Mavelikkara-Thattarambalam public road. The Sub Inspector of Police, Mavelikkara and his team are said to have intercepted the vehicle and subjected the petitioner to alcometer test, in which it was found that the alcohol content in his blood was 101 mg per 100 ml. The petitioner/accused was arrested on the spot and taken into custody. However, he was not subjected to the laboratory test as required under Section 204 of the MV Act. Instead, it appears that the petitioner was released on bail. Later on, the Sub Inspect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top