SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6926

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K. Babu, J
SPRING VALLEY AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES LLC – Appellant
Versus
JAMESON ABRAHAM – Respondent
OP(C) 1769/2020



Advocates:
ROSHEN.D.ALEXANDER, SMT.TINA ALEX THOMAS, SHRI.HARIMOHAN, SRI.SUNIL JOSEPH Sarin

The court affirmed that disputes arising from the import of merchandise qualify as commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act, allowing for transfer to the Commercial Court.

Headnote:(A) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Section 2(1)(c)(ii) - Transfer of suit - Plaintiff entered into an agreement for the import of raw cashew from Tanzania and sought to recover the balance amount after partial repayment - The trial Court transferred the suit to the Commercial Court based on the nature of the transaction as a commercial dispute - The plaintiff contended that the transaction did not qualify as a commercial dispute. (Paras 1, 2, 5, 9)

(B) Definition of Commercial Dispute - The court defined 'commercial dispute' under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, emphasizing that disputes arising from export or import of merchandise fall within its ambit - The plaintiff admitted the transaction was commercial, thus affirming the trial Court's decision to transfer the case. (Paras 7, 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiff entered into an agreement with the first defendant for importing raw cashew, transferring USD 1,080,000, and later sought to recover the remaining amount after receiving partial repayment. (Para 1)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the trial Court's order to transfer the suit to the Commercial Court, confirming that the transaction was commercial in nature. (Paras 9, 11)

Issues: The main issue was whether the transaction constituted a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act. (Para 5)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the transaction was commercial as defined by the Commercial Courts Act, and the trial Court had the authority to transfer the case based on the nature of the dispute. (Paras 9, 11)

Result: The Original Petition stands dismissed.

JUDGMENT

The plaintiff in O.S.No.21/2017 on the file of the Subordinate Judge’s Court, Kottarakara is the petitioner. The Defendants are the respondents. Defendant No.1 is a limited company located in Tanzania doing the business of exporting of raw cashew in shell. Defendant No.2 is managing the affairs of defendant No.1 company. Defendant No.3 is the owner of M/s. Emmanuel Cashew Industries, who is an agent of defendant Nos.1 and 2. The plaintiff entered into an agreement with defendant No.1 for the import of raw cashew from Tanzania. On 05.12.2016, the plaintiff transferred USD 1,080,000,00 (US Dollar one million and eighty thousand only) to the account of defendant No.1 from the account maintained by it in Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank. The plaintiff transferred the amount to the account of defendant No.1 upon assurance made by defendant No.3 that he would indemnify the plaintiff if the first defendant violates any conditions of the agreement between defendant No.1 and the plaintiff. The plaintiff did not get raw cashew as promised. The plaintiff demanded defendant No.3 to make arrangements to return the amount. Defendant No.1 returned USD 6,47,134 to the plaintiff in four instalments. The plaintiff instituted the Original Suit for realizing the balance amount.

2. Defendant No.3 filed an application before the trial Court seeking transfer of the suit to the Commercial Court, contending that the transaction arose from a commercial dispute. The learned Trial Judge allowed the application and ordered transfer of the suit to the Commercial Court. This order is under challenge in this Original Petition.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff and the learned counsel for the respondents/defendants.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff submits that the transaction involved does not come under commercial dispute and the trial Court was not empowered to transfer a suit to the Commercial Court on the application of the parties.

5. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the transaction comes under Section 2 (1)(c)(ii)

of the Commercial Courts Act.

6. The transaction arises from a contract entered between the defendants and the plaintiff in respect of import of raw cashew from Tanzania.

7. “Commercial dispute” is defined in section 2 (1)

(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, which reads thus:-

“2(1)(c) "commercial dispute" means a dispute arising out of-

(i) ordinary transactions of merchants, bankers, financiers and traders such as those relating to mercantile documents, including enforcement and interpretation of such documents;

(ii) export or import of merchandise or services;

(iii) issues relating to admiralty and maritime law;

(iv) transactions relating to aircraft, aircraft engines, aircraft equipment and helicopters, including sales, leasing and financing of the same;

(v) carriage of goods;

(vi) construction and infrastructure contracts, including tenders;

(vii) agreements relating to immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce;

(viii) franchising agreements;

(ix) distribution and licensing agreements;

(x) management and consultancy agreements;

(xi) joint venture agreements;

(xii) shareholders agreements;

(xiii) subscription and investment agreements pertaining to the services industry including outsourcing services and financial services;

(xiv) mercantile agency and mercantile usage;

(xv) partnership agreements;

(xvi) technology development agreements;

(xvii) intellectual property rights relating to registered and unregistered trademarks, copyright, patent, design, domain names, geographical indications and semi-conductor integrated circuits;

(xviii) agreements for sale of goods or provision of services;

(xix) exploitation of oil and gas reserves or other natural resources including electro-magnetic spectrum;

(xx) insurance and re-insurance;

(xxi) contracts of agency relating to any of the above; and (xxii) such other commercial disputes as may be notified by the Central Government.”

8. As per Sectio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top