JUDGMENT

Dated this the 07^th day of March, 2025

The writ petition is filed to direct the 1^st respondent bank to lift the freezing of the petitioner’s bank account bearing No.21190100109663.

2. The petitioner is the holder of the above bank account with the 1^st respondent bank. The petitioner contends that the 1^st respondent has frozen the petitioner’s bank account pursuant to a requisition from the 2^nd respondent. The action of the 1^st respondent is illegal and arbitrary. Hence, this writ petition.

3. Heard; the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 1^st respondent bank.

4. The learned counsel for the 1^st respondent submits that, the petitioner’s bank account has been credit freezed and also the 2^nd respondent has directed to mark a lien for Rs.1,14,700/-.

5. In considering an identical matter, this Court in Dr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India [ 2024 (1) KLT 826 ] held as follows:

“ a. The respondent Banks arrayed in these cases, are directed to confine the order of freeze against the accounts of the respective petitioners, only to the extent of the amounts mentioned in the order/requisition issued to them by the Police Authorities. This sha