SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15341

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THOMAS JOHN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 4690/2025



Advocates:
GERRY DOUGLES S. SONAM GERRY

Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when conditions are met, ensuring fair trial rights.

Headnote:

(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - Sections 316(2), 318(4) - Indian Penal Code - Section 420 - Bail application - Accused charged with cheating by offering non-existent visas and jobs - Serious allegations but indefinite incarceration not necessary - Bail granted with stringent conditions. (Paras 2, 3, 7, 8, 9)

(B) Principle of Bail - Bail is the rule and jail is the exception - Courts must grant bail when conditions are satisfied, ensuring fair trial rights under Article 21. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused in multiple cases of cheating related to job and visa offers for foreign countries, with allegations of not providing the promised services or refunds.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner could be released on bail under stringent conditions, considering the serious nature of the allegations but also the principle that bail should not be withheld as punishment.

Issues: The main issues included the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner and the necessity of continued incarceration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that bail is generally granted unless there are compelling reasons to deny it, reaffirming the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER :

These Bail Applications are filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ). Petitioner in these cases are one and the same. Therefore, I am disposing of these cases by a common order.

2. Petitioner is an accused in Crime Nos.188/2025 of Kattoor Police Station, 178/2025 of Cherpu Police Station, 94/2025 of Pothanikadu Police Station, 98/2025 of Pulpally Police Station & 231/2025 of Gandhinagar Police Station. The above cases are registered inter alia under Sections 316 (2), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ), 2023 and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. The prosecution case is that, the accused cheated the defacto complainant in these cases by offering visa and job in U.K, New Zeland and Australia. The visa or the job is not provided and the amount collected is not returned. Hence, it is alleged that the accused committed the offence.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.

5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner is in custody from 03.02.2025 and petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions, if this Court grants him bail.

6. Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

7. This Court considered the contentions of the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor. It is true that the allegations against the petitioner is very serious. The petitioner was first arrested on 03.02.2025, in connection with Crime No.897/2024 of Anchal Police Station. Thereafter, the arrest of the petitioner recorded in these cases on separate dates. The petitioner is in custody from 03.02.2025. Indefinite incarceration of the petitioner may not not be necessary. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I think, the petitioner can be released on bail after imposing stringent conditions.

8. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v Directorate of Enforcement [2019 (16) SCALE 870], after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of securing fair trial.

9. Moreover, in Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India [2024 KHC 6431], the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:

“21. Before we part with the Judgment, we must mention here that the Special Court and the High Court did not consider the material in the charge sheet objectively. Perhaps the focus was more on the activities of PFI, and therefore, the appellant's case could not be properly appreciated. When a case is made out for a grant of bail, the Courts should not have any hesitation in granting bail. The allegations of the prosecution may be very serious. But, the duty of the Courts is to consider the case for grant of bail in accordance with the law. "Bail is the rule and jail is an exception" is a settled law. Even in a case like the present case where there are stringent conditions for the grant of bail in the relevant statutes, the same rule holds good with only modification that the bail can be granted if the conditions in the statute are satisfied. The rule also means that once a case is made out for the grant of bail, the Court cannot decline to grant bail. If the Courts start denying bail in deserving cases, it will be a violation of the rights guaranteed under Art.21 of our Constitution.” (underline supplied)

10. In Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement [2024 KHC 6426], also the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:

“53. The Court further observed that, over a period of time, the trial courts and the High Courts have forgotten a very well - settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment. From our experience, we can say that it appears that the trial courts and the High Courts attempt to play safe in matters of grant of bail. The principle that bail is a rule and refusal is an exceptio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top