SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 13166

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
G.JAGAL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
KALEESWARAM RAJ A.ARUNA RIYA RAYMOL IYPE VARUN C.VIJAY

JUDGMENT

The Writ Petition is filed by street vendors who do various types of small business in their temporary sheds/carts/stalls on the sides of Mullackal Road in Alappuzha district. Paragraph 2 of the petition gives details of the petitioners, their vending activity, areas of operation, and the period from when they started occupying.

2. The petitioners were served with a notice by the 4th respondent, the Assistant Executive Engineer, Road Sub Division, National High Way Authority, Alappuzha, directing them to vacate from the places of street vending. The prayer in the Writ Petition is to quash the notices, and also declare that they are not liable to be evicted from their present place of street vending and also to restrain the respondents from evicting them.

3. Upon admission of the Writ Petition, there was an order of status quo passed on 18.07.2017. A statement has been filed on behalf of respondents 5 and 6 stating that in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 36 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulations of Street Vending Act 2014 (Central Act 7 of 2014), the Government of Kerala has framed Rules by name Kerala Street Vendors (Protection of Liv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top