HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
H.PREMKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P8 order.
2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of the writ petition are as follows: It is averred that at the time of filing of the writ petition petitioner is the Corporate Manager of the TD.Schools, Thuravoor/Alappuzha which is an educational agency as defined in the Kerala Education Act and Rules, which runs various educational institutions. Petitioner took charge as Corporate Manager of TD Schools on 21.12.2017. It is the contention of the petitioner that before he took charge as Corporate Manager of TD Schools the previous Manager has made appointment of Smt.Priya G. and Smt.Vidya Nandini P.J. as HSA(Hindi) on 03.06.2013 and 01.06.2015 respectively and the said appointments were duly approved and they were drawing salary and allowances. Later these two appointments were found to be illegal by the 3rd respondent on the ground that a senior HST(Hindi) was working on protection and that it was suppressing the above fact that the Manager made appointments of Smt.Priya G. and Smt.Vidya Nandini P.J. and got it approved. Thereupon Ext.P1 order was issued by the 3rd respondent. Pursuant to Ext.P1 the petitioner who was the t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.