SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4567

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. Sudha, J
MURUKAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.V.SETHUNATH SRI.S.JUSTUS

Table of Content
1. accused engaged in distilling arrack (Para 2)
2. charge sheet filed against accused (Para 4)
3. accused pleaded not guilty (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. materials insufficient to establish guilt (Para 13)

J U D G M E N T

In this appeal filed under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C., the appellant who is the sole accused in S.C.No827/2012 on the file of the Court of Session, Pathanamthitta, challenges the conviction entered and sentence passed against him for the offences punishable under Sections 55 (g) and 8(1) read with Section 8 (2) of the Abkari Act , 1 of 1077 (the Act).

2. The prosecution case is that on 24/06/2005 at 05:30 p.m., the accused along with another person was found engaged in distilling arrack in the lean-to the house of one Vellara Nirappel Sahadevan situated in Thekkumala. Hence, the accused as per the final report/charge sheet is alleged to have committed the offences punishable under the aforementioned Sections.

3. Crime no.17/2005, Excise range, Ranni, that is Ext.P6 crime and occurrence report was registered by PW5, the Preventive officer, to whom the accused, the contraband articles and the documents were handed over by PW4, the Detecting off

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top