HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
RAMLATH – Appellant
Versus
THE GRIEVANCE OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bank account frozen (Para 2) |
| 2. submission recorded (Para 4) |
| 3. considering an identical matter (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. total failure to report (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2025 The writ petition is filed to direct the 3rd respondent bank to lift the debit freezing of the petitioner’s bank account bearing No.0515053000011928.
2. The petitioner is the holder of the above bank account with the 3rd respondent bank. The petitioner contends that the 3rd respondent bank has frozen the petitioner’s bank account pursuant to a requisition received from the 4th respondent. The action of the 3rd respondent is illegal and arbitrary.
3. Heard; the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader, the learned DGSI and the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned counsel appearing for 3rd respondent submitted that the disputed amount is Rs.12,000/-. The said submission is recorded.
5. In considering an identical matter, this Court in Dr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India [2024 (1) KLT 826] held as follows:
“ a. The respondent Banks arrayed in these cases, are directed to confine the order of freeze against the accounts o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.