SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 13217

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
ABUBACKER SIDHIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 4026/2025



Advocates:
A.R.DILEEP

Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; courts must grant bail when a case is made out, ensuring fair trial rights.

Headnote:(A) Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67 and 67B - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 11(iv) and 12 - Bail application filed by the accused in a case involving serious allegations of circulating nude photographs of a minor - Petitioner in custody since 23.02.2025 - Maximum punishment for alleged offences is below 7 years - Court considers period of detention and grants bail with stringent conditions. (Paras 2, 6, 10)

(B) Bail - Principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception - Courts must grant bail when a case is made out, despite serious allegations - The duty of the Courts is to consider bail applications in accordance with law, ensuring fair trial rights. (Paras 7, 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused of securing and circulating nude photographs of a minor through social media. He was arrested on 23.02.2025 and has been in custody since then.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner is granted bail on executing a bond with stringent conditions, including cooperation with the investigation and restrictions on leaving the country.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the serious nature of the allegations and the duration of custody.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, and that courts should not deny bail in deserving cases, reaffirming the principle of fair trial rights.

Result: Bail application allowed.

O R D E R

This Bail Application is filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

2. Petitioner is an accused in Crime No. 250/2025 of Vadakkancherry Police Station. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections 67 and 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short 'IT Act') and also under Secs. 11(iv) & 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.

3. The prosecution case is that, for the period from 20.10.2023 till 22.02.2025, the accused secured the nude photographs of the survivor through her Instagram account and he circulated the said photographs through mobile phones and thus the petitioner committed the offences. The petitioner was arrested on 23.02.2025.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.

5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 23.02.2025. The counsel submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide any conditions, if this Court grants him bail. The Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

6. It is true that the allegation against the petitioner is serious. The maximum punishment that can be imposed for the offences alleged is below 7 years. The petitioner is in custody from 23.02.2025. Considering the period of detention and also considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I think the petitioner can be released on bail, after imposing stringent conditions.

7. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v Directorate of Enforcement [2019 (16) SCALE 870], after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of securing fair trial.

8. Moreover, in Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India [2024 KHC 6431], the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:

“21. Before we part with the Judgment, we must mention here that the Special Court and the High Court did not consider the material in the charge sheet objectively. Perhaps the focus was more on the activities of PFI, and therefore, the appellant's case could not be properly appreciated. When a case is made out for a grant of bail, the Courts should not have any hesitation in granting bail. The allegations of the prosecution may be very serious. But, the duty of the Courts is to consider the case for grant of bail in accordance with the law. "Bail is the rule and jail is an exception" is a settled law. Even in a case like the present case where there are stringent conditions for the grant of bail in the relevant statutes, the same rule holds good with only modification that the bail can be granted if the conditions in the statute are satisfied. The rule also means that once a case is made out for the grant of bail, the Court cannot decline to grant bail. If the Courts start denying bail in deserving cases, it will be a violation of the rights guaranteed under Art.21 of our Constitution.”

(underline supplied)

9. In Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement [2024 KHC 6426], also the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that:

“53. The Court further observed that, over a period of time, the trial courts and the High Courts have forgotten a very well - settled principle of law that bail is not to be withheld as a punishment. From our experience, we can say that it appears that the trial courts and the High Courts attempt to play safe in matters of grant of bail. The principle that bail is a rule and refusal is an exception is, at times, followed in breach. On account of non - grant of bail even in straight forward open and shut cases, this Court is flooded with huge number of bail petitions thereby adding to the huge pendency. It is high time that the trial courts and the High Courts should recognize the principle that "bail is rule and ja

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top