SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1171

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BEN ROY ISAC – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 196/2025



Advocates:
K.B.GANGESH, SMITHA CHATHANARAMBATH

The court directed the petitioner to surrender to the Investigating Officer and allowed him to file a bail application before the jurisdictional court, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures.

Headnote:(A) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 7, 8, 9(l), (n), (t) and 10 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - Section 74 - Bail application filed under Section 482 - Allegations of sexual offences against the petitioner involving his daughter and step-daughter - The court found that this is not a fit case for bail orders under Section 482 and directed the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Bail - The petitioner is allowed to surrender before the Investigating Officer and file a bail application before the jurisdictional court, which shall consider it in accordance with law. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused in Crime No.1154/2024, alleging sexual offences against his daughter and prior conviction in a related case involving his step-daughter.

Findings of Court:
The court disposed of the bail application with directions for surrender and subsequent bail application consideration.

Issues: The main issue was whether the bail application could be entertained under Section 482 given the serious allegations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the case does not warrant bail orders under Section 482 and emphasized the need for the petitioner to surrender and follow due process for bail consideration.

Result: Bail application disposed of with directions.

ORDER

This Bail application is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1154/2024 of Venjaramoodu Police Station. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offence punishable under Section 8 read with Section 7 , Section 10 read with Section 9 (l), (n) and (t) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita .

3. The victim in this case is the daughter of the petitioner. It is alleged that on 14.09.2024 at about 7.30 pm, while she was sleeping in the bedroom, the petitioner with sexual intent came to the room and lie along with her and he with sexual intent embraced her and attempted to remover her T-shirt and inappropriately touched her. It is also alleged that the petitioner is involved in yet another case in which he committed rape on her step-daughter. He is convicted in that case and the appeal is pending before this Court.

4. After hearing both sides, I think this is not a fit case, in which orders u/s.482 BNSS can be passed. At this stage the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will surrender before the Investigating Officer. The counsel also submitted that there may be a direction to produce the petitioner after interrogation before the jurisdictional court and there may be a direction to the jurisdictional court to consider the bail application on the date of production of the petitioner. I think that prayer can be allowed.

5. Considering the submission of the counsel for the petitioner, this bail application is disposed of with the following directions.

1) The petitioner will surrender before the Investigating Officer within two weeks from today.

2) If the petitioner surrender before the Investigating Officer as directed above, the Investigating Officer is free to interrogate the petitioner and shall produce the petitioner before the jurisdictional court on the date of surrender itself.

3) The petitioner is free to file bail application before the jurisdictional court at the time of producing him before the Magistrate. If such a bail application is filed with advance copy to the prosecutor concerned, the jurisdictional court will consider that bail application in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders in it preferably on the date of filing of the same itself.

4) The Investigating Officer is free to file custody application, if necessary, at the time of producing the petitioner and if such application is filed, the jurisdictional court is free to pass appropriate orders in it also.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top