SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9615

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Dr, Kauser Edappagath, J
RAFEEQ M.B – Appellant
Versus
ALFIA – Respondent
OP(Crl.) 93/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ENOCH DAVID, SIMON JOEL, S. SREEDEV, RONY JOSE, LEO LUKOSE, KAROL MATHEWS, SEBASTIAN ALENCHERRY, DERICK MATHAI, SAJI KARAN, SCARIA ABRAHAM, ITTOOP JOY THATTIL
For the Respondents: BALASUBRAMANYAN, MUHAMMED ASHIK, PRIYANKA SUSAN RAJU, VAISAKH J.

The court emphasized the necessity of providing parties the right to be heard, setting aside a maintenance order made without affording such an opportunity.

Headnote:This judgment concerns an order granting interim maintenance challenged by the petitioner under Section 125 of the Cr.PC. The Family Court had directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance without affording him an opportunity to file an objection statement. The Court found that this constituted a failure of due process and set aside the Family Court's order, directing it to reassess the application for interim maintenance. The original petition is disposed of as above.

Table of Content
1. interim maintenance orders must ensure the right to a fair hearing. (Para 1 , 2)
2. failure to provide opportunity for objection invalidates maintenance order. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2025 Ext.P5 order granting interim maintenance is under challenge in this original petition.

2. The petitioner is the husband of the 1st respondent and father of the 2nd respondent. The respondents against the petitioner seeking maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.PC before the Family Court, Mavelikara. The respondents also filed Crl.MP No.361/2024 seeking interim maintenance. The Family Court directed the petitioner to pay interim monthly maintenance to the respondents at the rate of Rs.5,000/- each from the date of the petition. The said order is under challenge in this original petition.

3. I have heard both sides.

The main contention taken by the petitioner is that the impugned order was passed without affording an opportunity to him to file an objection statement. I had called for the proceedings sheet from the Family Court. It would show that the application for interim maintenance came up for hearing on 18.06.2024 which was adjourned to 15.07.2024, and on that date it was allowed. Thus, it is clear that the impugned order was passed without giving an opportunity to the petitioner for filing objection or for hearing. Thus the impugned order is set aside. The Family Court is directed to reconsider and dispose of Crl.MP No.361 of 2024 afresh after affording an opportunity to the petitioner for filing objection and hearing within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The original petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE sbk/-

APPENDIX OF OP(CRL.) 93/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM IN M.C. NO.

133/2024 DATED 17.04.2024 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA.

Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY RESPONDENT DATED 20.04.2023 IN M.C.NO.

50/2022 ON THE FILES OF THE HON’BLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE’S COURT II, MAVELIKKARA.

Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES IN M.C.133/2024 FILED BY THE

1ST PETITIONER DATED 22.10.2022.

Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN M.C.

133/2024 DATED 15.07.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT SEEKING FURTHER TIME FOR FILING OBJECTION.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.07.2024 IN CRL.M.P.361/2024 IN M.C.NO.133/2024 ON THE FILES OF THE HON’BLE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA.

Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE CASE STATUS IN M.C. NO.

133/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA OBTAINED FROM THE E-

COURTS WEBSITE.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top