SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11622

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Ziyad Rahman A. A, J
SAJI JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE VILLAGE OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates:
G.HARIHARAN, PRAVEEN.H., K.S.SMITHA, V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, GENTLE C.D., BIJOY SAM GEORGE, PREETHA K K

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the absolute owner in possession of 21.24 Ares comprised in Re.Sy. No.709/2 of Manjoor Village in Vaikom Taluk, which he obtained as per settlement deed No.1436 of 2008 of S.R.O., Kaduthuruthy. The said property was lying as a purayidam and in the Ext.P1 possession certificate issued on 27.01.2010 the description of the said property is as such. However, later, some corrections were carried out in the revenue records and the property was shown as ‘Nilam’. In such circumstances, the petitioner submitted an application on 20.05.2015, under Clause 6 of Kerala Land Utilization Order seeking permission to use the said property for the some other purposes. Even though the said application was initially rejected by the 3rd respondent, after several rounds of litigations, the matter was again reconsidered by the 3rd respondent and it ultimately culminated in Ext.P9 order by which the relief sought by the petitioner was allowed and the permission was granted to the petitioner to convert the property. The aforesaid order is dated 19.05.2022.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite Ext.P9 order, the petitioner was issued with a possession certificate as e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top